I wouldn't, however, recommend making such insane claims. It's probably better to slow play it, leading the lawyers to believe that any relevant preconceptions or character defining beliefs you "have" are subtle, but apparent enough to ruin your objectivity in the case. The stakes here are pretty high -- check this out.

In England today, a court was subjected to a 10-minute audio recording of this British couple making whoopie, bumping uglies, getting it on, whatever you want to call it. Though dealing with sex, this recording was far from sexy, apparently sounding like both people involved were in 'considerable pain.' The plaintiff described the noises as 'murder' and 'unnatural, though only recorded at a maximum of 47 decibels, which is almost 15 decibels quieter than the average conversation. Whether it was the disturbing nature of the tape or other circumstances, shortly after it was played, the hearing was adjourned until Tuesday.
I'm not exactly sure what to say to this, most further thoughts on the subject are replaced by "gross gross gross, ewwww" accompanied by a gross mental image of the unflattering picture above. I'm not really sure if this is the kind of trial that would warrant a jury, but if it is, I wouldn't be surprised to see some mental anguish suits brought up against the plaintiff in retaliation for the punishment she put this court through.
No comments:
Post a Comment